The Attorney Of Record And Court-Ordered Invisibilization Of Adoption's Natural Mothers
It's lower living than the 3/5 (three-fifths) status loosely-recognized of slaves 1, because since NOT even this paltry amount of recognition is afforded natural mothers of adoption then they live as members of a non-recognized class of citizens. This is what validates the grievances about the court-based erasing from existence, of adoption's natural mothers, and then the sustaining their removal by those in the judiciary specifically who are the judges and lawyers among others. This court-rooted invisibilization of any given first mother in adoption begins when the judge and attorney of record take the final adoption-related action against her.
This means a natural mother is subject to court-ordered removal from society by her identity and other personal details being hidden in a closed/sealed adoption file. So similar to a convicted person's court-ordered removal from society for criminal imprisonment a first mother's dispostion in an adoption os that she's placed under court-ordered removal from society when her personal detailed are concealed in a closed/sealed adoption file.
It's the adoption attorney of record specifically who initiates the final closing/sealing of its related file. Then the judge issues a final judgment or court order that essentially, along with the file being closed/sealed, constitutes the natural mothers's invisibilization. Obviously this shows that invisibilization of natural mothers is by court order.
Since the attorney of record "...is entitled to receive...all documents..." 2, related to any/all adoption[s] he transacts it thus is obvious who removes adoption-related documents from agencies and centralizes these documents into one collection designated an adoption record and then initiates its closing/sealing. This means the attorney of record is key to displacing documents even if they do NOT relate to the adoption in question--and you can be sure that at least a handful of said documents do NOT relate to any adoption matter of which she is the natural mother--and so shows lawyers are directly responsible for the DISAPPEARED/INVISIBILIZED NATURAL MOTHERS OF ADOPTION.
Claiming thus to be acting for "clients" which he can do in perpetuity 3, or forever which in turn means such a lawyer can continue making this claim even after any given adoption's finalization and closure if he and/or anyone else wants to track the natural mother by pretending to be acting for "clients"--these attorneys of record make natural mothers remain banished. Such attorneys of record keep natural mothers away after transacting the adoption of their child[ren], to others, in other words.
The clandestine adoption record can be accessed at will by a select few, only, who are the same attorneys of record who transact[ed] adoption[s] as well as the judges who preside[d] over adoption cases along with some para-legals and maybe a few court clerks. Indeed these are a privileged few! And these attorneys along with the judges plus those few para-legals and court clerks all want their privileged status to remain.
One way of ensuring this is described by the adoption case-related INaction which also can be attributed to adoptions' attorneys of record. Establishing and maintaining silence among themeselves along with others who know things about adoption because disclosure of this information might damage and so be against their own interests or those of their associates constitutes the in-action that's inherent in what eventually becomes their conspiracy of silence.
In fact these adoption-related attorneys of records' schizophrenic silence AND their efforts to maintain such muteness about what they wrote/write slanderously about adoption's natural mothers bellows thunderously. These are lawyers almost overcome by their own unethical behavior.
Such is why adoption attorneys of record who wrote/write UNtrue information about natural mothers in adotpions they transact[ed] and/or such lawyers who currently inscribe false details about first mothers in adoption business they conduct are UNnaturally consistent about keeping their silence. They lawyers are constant about hiding the lies they know they wrote/write about any given biological mother in the records they (the lawyers) generate[d] during the adoption's legal procedure of her child being adopted out relative to annihilating the natural mother whose child was/is adopted because they are afraid of getting into trouble for falsifying the records they created among other things because they do not want to be sued. To describe specifically this conspiracy of silence maintained by these corrupt attorneys of record about adoptions they transact[ed] it can be defined as concealment by non-disclosure.4
Though the human-created adoption "killing" of any given natural mother may accommodate her child being "re-born" so to be adopted there is a basic problem with this. Here's the difficulty.
Her child also is "murdered". In being the natural-born child of a mother "murdered" so s/he as the child can be "re-born" for adoption inherently means the natural-born child is "murdered" so s/he can be an adopted child.
Since mothers who keep their baby are not "killed" when their child is born this shows that the actual reason mothers who do NOT keep their baby because they surrender them--to be adopted--are "murdered" as punishment. It's because these mothers let go their child in other words, for adoption, that they are "killed". More specifically such mothers are "killed" because they abandon, from their act of relinquishment, their child. "Murdering" a natural mother penalizes her. "Killing" her child, who is adopted out, allows for a new start.
1, The U.S. Constitution
2, Black's Law Dictionary; see ATTORNEY OF RECORD
3, Black's Law Dictionary; see PERPETUITY
4, Black's Law Dictionary; see CONCEALMENT BY NON-DISCLOSURE
